How would you determine whether two singly linked lists intersect by reference, and how would you locate the intersection node?

Master Linked Lists Structures for Data Structures Tests. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions with detailed explanations for each, ensuring your readiness for the exam!

Multiple Choice

How would you determine whether two singly linked lists intersect by reference, and how would you locate the intersection node?

Explanation:
The idea being tested is detecting and locating an intersection by reference, meaning the two lists share node objects from a certain point onward, not just equal values. To find the intersection node, first determine how long each list is. If one list is longer, advance its head by the difference in lengths so both pointers are the same distance from their ends. Then move both pointers forward together; the first time they reference the same node is the intersection node. If you reach the end (null) without a match, there is no intersection. This approach runs in linear time, O(n + m), and uses constant extra space, since you only track two pointers. Why other ideas don’t fit: comparing values at nodes can falsely claim an intersection when two distinct nodes happen to hold the same value, which isn’t about shared references. swapping next pointers is destructive and corrupts the lists, so it’s not a safe or correct method. using a hash set of visited nodes can detect an intersection by reference, but it requires additional space, whereas the alignment-by-length method achieves the result with O(1) extra space.

The idea being tested is detecting and locating an intersection by reference, meaning the two lists share node objects from a certain point onward, not just equal values. To find the intersection node, first determine how long each list is. If one list is longer, advance its head by the difference in lengths so both pointers are the same distance from their ends. Then move both pointers forward together; the first time they reference the same node is the intersection node. If you reach the end (null) without a match, there is no intersection. This approach runs in linear time, O(n + m), and uses constant extra space, since you only track two pointers.

Why other ideas don’t fit: comparing values at nodes can falsely claim an intersection when two distinct nodes happen to hold the same value, which isn’t about shared references. swapping next pointers is destructive and corrupts the lists, so it’s not a safe or correct method. using a hash set of visited nodes can detect an intersection by reference, but it requires additional space, whereas the alignment-by-length method achieves the result with O(1) extra space.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy